
It was a little bit once, Douty will be dismissed a second time
If the Elections and Appointments Committee votes to dismiss Ilire Dauti, the proposal must again go to a plenary session at which the MPs who have already voted no confidence will vote to dismiss MP Dauti from the position of Chairwoman of the Social Policy Committee.
The Parliament will dismiss the chairwoman of the Social Policy Committee for the second time Ilire Dauti if she does not resign herself, after the MPs have already voted no confidence in her by a majority. The absurdity of the plenum again discussing the dismissal of the president will follow after the President of the Assembly Afrim Gashi stated that for him the interpellation has no legal effect and the matter is finished, although he did not send the conclusion of the session to the Elections and Appointments Committee, so that the procedure can be completed with the election of a new president. After playing out the parliamentary procedure, it now depends on Dauti whether the "game" with the interpellation will last, that is, if a vote of no confidence is voted, they will dismiss it again.
Recommended

According to some MPs, given that Gashi is avoiding finalizing the procedure, the expectations are that MPs will submit the conclusion of the session or initiate the dismissal of Dauti in the Elections and Appointments Committee. If the Committee votes to dismiss Dauti, the proposal must again go to a plenary session at which the MPs, having already voted no confidence, will now vote to dismiss MP Dauti from the position of chairwoman of the Social Policy Committee. The absurdity is that the MPs will spend citizens' money twice to remove Dauti from the position of chairwoman of a committee, even though she herself confirmed immediately after the vote of no confidence that she had been dismissed from that position. It was Gashi's position that the interpellation has no legal effect that caused confusion, but also an opportunity for Dauti to make a political point, so he asked the President of the Assembly to convene a plenary session at which he would revoke her dismissal because, as he said, only then would she accept to continue as chairwoman of the Committee.
Left has already announced that it will demand Dauti's dismissal if she does not resign and has assessed Gashi's position as scandalous and violent. Levica is determined that it will not allow the constitutional institute of "interpellation" to be degraded.
– Gashi's scandalous and unprofessional statements that he will not submit the adopted conclusion of the interpellation are a flagrant expression of his arbitrariness, which puts Mickoski's party with 58 MPs in a subordinate position. The statements that the interpellation has no legally binding effect are an elementary disrespect for the Constitution and the legislature, as the highest body that exercises control over the work of elected and appointed officials. The interpellation for the MP from the Alliance for Albanians was voted on with an absolute majority of MPs, i.e. with 61 MPs, which directly implies the weight of the political decision. If an absolute majority of 61 MPs is enough even for a vote of no confidence in the government, it is unclear how certain political figures consciously degrade the Constitution and declare that this majority is not enough to dismiss the president of a parliamentary committee – say from Levica.

The party expects Dauti to demonstrate political responsibility and preserve her integrity as a member of Parliament, by respecting the adopted conclusion in the Parliament, which clearly specifies that Dauti, as the president of a parliamentary committee, violated the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament.
– Otherwise, Levica is ready to initiate a motion for dismissal to the Parliamentary Committee on Elections and Appointments, chaired by the MP from the ranks of DPMNE, Gjorgjija Sajkoski. We expect the ruling majority to propose such a well-founded proposal to Levica, in order to protect the legislative house from the arbitrariness of certain political actors. In order to clarify the unconstitutional interpretations in the public, we emphasize that the legal norms are clear: the ruling majority through the parliamentary committee has the legal opportunity and obligation to dismiss Ilire Dauti if she continues to violate the Rules of Procedure and does not resign from the position of chair of the committee. For Levica, Ilire Dauti has been dismissed by the chair of the Committee on Social Policy, Demography and Youth with the voted interpellation. It is shameful that Speaker Gashi and his party are trying to score ethnic points by violating the legal and rules of procedure norms and continue with destructive policies – say from Levica.
Sajkoski has already stated that he did not receive the notification and conclusion from the session from Gashi and that the Commission cannot take any action itself regarding the interpellation.
– The conclusion of the Assembly states that the allegations in the interpellation are well-founded, that is, with 61 MPs, Speaker Dauti has been dismissed because she did not comply with the rules of procedure. That is the essence. We are waiting for the next steps from the parliamentary groups – says Sajkoski.
He also believes that after the voted interpellation, Douty herself should resign.

Gashi, however, has already informed that his role as president has ended with the process of interpellation of the president of the Commission and he has passed the ball to Sajkoski, i.e. that the Elections and Appointments Commission, the parliamentary groups or the MPs are responsible for dismissal or resignation. He referred to the example of the recent interpellation against him, but did not say that he was not voted no confidence.
– From a procedural point of view, this issue has been resolved. Any other interpretation than this is simply political rhetoric for everyday use and has no legal basis, in which I, as the President of the Assembly, will not participate – says Gashi.